While it’s a common perception that the driver who rear-ends another vehicle is always at fault, this is not necessarily always the case in Texas. In this state, the fault is determined by the concept of “negligence”, which means a driver didn’t exercise reasonable care or violated a traffic law, leading to the rear-end accident.
No, you are not automatically always at fault when you rear-end another vehicle in Texas. Although the driver who rear-ended the other vehicle is often found negligent because they were following too closely or not paying attention, there are circumstances where the lead driver is wholly or partially at fault. For instance, if the lead driver abruptly stops, they could bear some or all of the responsibility for the accident.
Negligence laws differ by state in the United States as they relate to auto accidents. In Texas, the doctrine of “modified comparative negligence” – also known as proportionate responsibility – is applied when determining fault in a car accident. This rule stipulates that a party can recover damages only if they are less than 51% at fault for the accident. If a party is found to be 51% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any personal injury damages.
Let’s consider an example to better understand how modified comparative negligence may be applied in a rear-end accident in Texas. Imagine a situation where Driver A rear-ends Driver B. However, at the time of the accident, Driver B’s brake lights were not functional, which is a violation of traffic laws. After investigation, the court determined that Driver A is 70% at fault for following too closely, and Driver B is 30% at fault for having non-working brake lights.
Suppose Driver B’s total damages (e.g., medical bills, car repair costs, pain and suffering) are calculated to be $10,000. According to Texas’s modified comparative negligence laws, Driver B’s fault would reduce his damage recovery by his percentage of fault. So, Driver B would reduce his damages by 30%, or $3,000, leaving him with a recoverable amount of $7,000.
If Driver A had any damages, he would not be able to recover anything because he is more than 51% at fault under Texas law. This example showcases how the allocation of fault in a rear-end collision can significantly impact the financial recovery of the parties involved.
There are several scenarios where the driver in the front can be deemed partially or wholly at fault for a rear-end accident. These situations are evaluated based on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the accident.
The driver in the front could be found partially at fault in situations such as:
Remember, while these scenarios could place partial fault on the lead driver, the specifics of each accident will significantly impact the determination of negligence.
In some unique circumstances, the driver in the front might be found to be wholly at fault:
Remember, each accident is unique and liability can differ based on the specifics of the situation.
Establishing fault in multi-vehicle pile-up accidents can be complex due to the involvement of multiple drivers and the potential for a chain reaction of impacts. Generally, the driver who initially causes the collision – often the vehicle at the back of the pile-up – is typically found at fault. However, Texas’s modified comparative negligence principles may come into play, with each driver’s actions before the accident being evaluated.
For instance, if a driver was following too closely and instigated the first collision in the pile-up, they might be found primarily at fault. However, if another driver in the pile-up was found to have non-working brake lights or was driving erratically, they could also bear a portion of the fault. Similarly, a driver who was unable to stop in time to avoid hitting a vehicle that had already been in a collision could also share some liability.
Due to the multifaceted nature of these incidents, determining fault in a multi-vehicle pile-up requires a thorough investigation. Expert witnesses such as accident reconstruction specialists can provide valuable insights. Furthermore, it is crucial for individuals involved in such accidents to consult with an experienced Texas car accident lawyer who can navigate the complex litigation that multi-vehicle accidents often involve.
If you’ve been injured in a rear-end accident where you were either not at fault or partially at fault, your case might significantly benefit from the professional advice of an accident attorney. Understanding the complexities of negligence laws and their application can be challenging, but with the help of an experienced attorney, you can navigate the process more effectively.
At Thompson Law, we specialize in such cases and are dedicated to ensuring that your rights are protected and that you receive the compensation you deserve. Contact us today for a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case and understand how we can support you through this challenging time.
Thompson Law receives an attorney fee and you pay no legal fees as our client unless we pay you. Thompson Law has 350 years of combined experience in legal representation and has won over $1.8 billion dollars in cash settlements for our clients. We master the art of managing client cases with empathy, compassion, respect and, of course, prodigious skill. Contact us today for a free, risk-free consultation to discuss your accident and your options.
State law limits the time you have to file a claim after an auto accident. If you have been injured in an accident, call now to get the help you need.